STATISTICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND MULTIVARIATE MODELING OF ELECTROCHEMICAL POLARIZATION RESPONSE VARIABILITY

Authors

  • Dr. Nathaniel R. Collins Department of Electrochemical Engineering and Statistical Analysis, Westbridge University of Technology, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Prof. Isabelle M. Laurent Institute of Materials Science and Electrochemical Research, École Nationale des Sciences Appliquées, Lyon, France
  • Dr. Hiroshi K. Yamamoto Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Statistics, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Japan
  • Dr. Daniel A. Fischer School of Data Science and Corrosion Engineering, Rhine Technical University, Düsseldorf, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/y9gqaa47

Keywords:

electrochemical polarization, statistical modeling, numerical characterization, principal component analysis, response variability

Abstract

Electrochemical polarization curves encode quantitative data about response size, response dispersion, integrated response behavior and gradient characteristics, but these attributes are most often studied individually instead of in an integrated statistical framework. This study aimed to characterize polarization-response variability across experimental conditions and identify the dominant multivariate structure of curve-derived numerical features. A total of 955 polarization curves across five NaCl concentration and scan-rate conditions were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis test with epsilon-squared effect sizes, log-transformation regression modeling, principal component analysis, and sensitivity analysis (with ≥95% curve completeness) were analyzed. All principal characteristics differed significantly across experimental conditions (p<0.001), with epsilon-squared values ranging from 0.257 to 0.489. Mean absolute slope showed the strongest between-condition separation and the highest regression fit (R2=0.509). PC1 explained 90.583% of the total variance, while PC1 and PC2 jointly accounted for 97.274%. Sensitivity analysis produced comparable statistical and multivariate patterns. The results show that numerical feature extraction combined with inferential, regression, and multivariate methods is a concise and powerful approach to characterise the variability in electrochemical polarization-response.

 

References

[1]. Black, W., & Babin, B. J. (2019). Multivariate data analysis: Its approach, evolution, and impact. In The great facilitator: Reflections on the contributions of Joseph F. Hair, Jr. to marketing and business research (pp. 121-130). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[2]. Chen, W., Wang, K., He, X., Chen, X., Huang, T., Chen, J., ... & Hu, J. (2025). Mitigating electrode polarization through electrolyte concentration optimization. Nano Energy, 139, 110950.

[3]. Choudhary, Y. S., Jothi, L., & Nageswaran, G. (2017). Electrochemical characterization. In Spectroscopic Methods for Nanomaterials Characterization (pp. 19-54). Elsevier.

[4]. Coelho, L. B. (2023). Micro-scale potentiodynamic polarisation curves of 316L stainless steel [Data set]. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/78rz8vw46x.2

[5]. Coelho, L. B., Torres, D., Vangrunderbeek, V., Bernal, M., Paldino, G. M., Bontempi, G., & Ustarroz, J. (2023). Estimating pitting descriptors of 316 L stainless steel by machine learning and statistical analysis. NPJ Materials Degradation, 7(1), 82.

[6]. Del Zotto, L., Tamburrano, G., Dell'Era, A., Hatunoglu, A., & Ciro, E. (2024). Determination and validation of polarization losses parameters to predict current/voltage-characteristics for SOFC button cell. Energy Conversion and Management, 299, 117877.

[7]. Eliaz, N., & Gileadi, E. (2019). Physical electrochemistry: fundamentals, techniques, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

[8]. Geană, E. I., Ciucure, C. T., & Apetrei, C. (2020). Electrochemical sensors coupled with multivariate statistical analysis as screening tools for wine authentication issues: A review. Chemosensors, 8(3), 59.

[9]. Hu, J., Guo, H., Li, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Huang, W., ... & Pan, F. (2021). Understanding Li-ion thermodynamic and kinetic behaviors in concentrated electrolyte for the development of aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy, 89, 106413.

[10]. Hung, Y., Bu, Y., Kubin, J., & Weinman, D. (2017, October). Effects of current scan rate on the polarization curve of vanadium redox flow batteries. In 2017 International Energy and Sustainability Conference (IESC) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

[11]. Jamali, S. S., Wu, Y., Homborg, A. M., Lemay, S. G., & Gooding, J. J. (2024). Interpretation of stochastic electrochemical data. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 46, 101505.

[12]. Lyu, Z., Wang, G., & Tan, C. (2022). A novel Bayesian multivariate linear regression model for online state-of-health estimation of Lithium-ion battery using multiple health indicators. Microelectronics Reliability, 131, 114500.

[13]. Maradesa, A., Py, B., Huang, J., Lu, Y., Iurilli, P., Mrozinski, A., ... & Ciucci, F. (2024). Advancing electrochemical impedance analysis through innovations in the distribution of relaxation times method. Joule, 8(7), 1958-1981.

[14]. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Taylor, C. C. (2024). Multivariate analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

[15]. Nuñez Perez, F. A. (2025). Analytical–Computational Integration of Equivalent Circuit Modeling, Hybrid Optimization, and Statistical Validation for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Electrochem, 6(4), 35.

[16]. Robinson, S. G., & Sigman, M. S. (2020). Integrating electrochemical and statistical analysis tools for molecular design and mechanistic understanding. Accounts of Chemical Research, 53(2), 289-299.

[17]. Strebl, M. G., Bruns, M. P., & Virtanen, S. (2023). Respirometric in situ methods for real-time monitoring of corrosion rates: Part III. Deconvolution of electrochemical polarization curves. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 170(6), 061503.

[18]. Sun, J., Sun, S., Yang, X., Xie, F., & Shao, Z. (2025). Investigation on the distribution of dynamic polarization behavior of proton exchange membrane fuel cells based on time resolution electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Applied Energy, 381, 125111.

[19]. Suzer, S., Strelcov, E., & Kolmakov, A. (2021). Comparative operando XPS and SEM spatiotemporal potential mapping of ionic liquid polarization in a coplanar electrochemical device. Analytical Chemistry, 93(39), 13268-13273.

[20]. Wang, S., Wang, Y., & Soo, Y. Y. (2025). Evaluation and prediction of lithium-ion battery pack inconsistency in electric vehicles based on actual operating data. Energy, 319, 134879.

[21]. Zhu, D., Li, J., Zheng, Z., Ye, S., Pan, Y., Wu, J., ... & Chen, Y. (2024). Water and salt concentration-dependent electrochemical performance of hydrogel electrolytes in zinc-ion batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 16(13), 16175-16185.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30